Filed Under: Thinking Out Loud
From another book I was browsing through today:
Stupidity Training
The conversation between a True Believer and a True Skeptic isn’t much of a conversation, really.
What you have are two people who are dead-set in their opinions ready to say just about anything to justify those opinions.
It’s not an exploration of ideas, but a chest-pounding shouting match.
He who can yell the loudest and use the cleverest persuasive linguistic tricks wins.
When people talk this way and it’s presented as “intelligent conversation” it trains people to think that’s what intelligent conversation is supposed to sound like.
If they haven’t seen an actual egoless intelligent conversation between people who are actually looking for the truth, they won’t know any better.
This same pseudo-intelligent conversation takes place on most of the news “debate” shows as well.
Related Items
Subscribe to comments feed (this is global, not just for this entry)
Defining ‘blogging’ is like explaining ‘God’ (without the likelihood of ensuing bloodshed) - every blogger and non-blogger has their own idea of what ‘blogging’ is (and every believer, non-believer and fence-rider has their own idea of what ‘God’ is), and they’re all wrong about both.
When you can’t agree on what something is, it’s time to [...]
Ever since I started working online, I’ve had trouble answering a very simple question - what do you do?
In university it was easy - you could tell them you were studying computer science and while you never wanted to write code again in your life, people would have no problems in attaching a convenient label [...]
Thursday, 9 October 2008.
Another bomb went off in Islamabad today, this time hitting the Anti-Terrorism Wing in the Police Headquarters. Where was everyone? The other end of the city, providing security for a 2-day briefing session on Anti-Terrorism.
It would be a laughing matter if a bomb going off in Pakistan wasn’t such a common affair. [...]